Resolving Divorce Matters Outside the Courtroom in New Jersey

Divorce is emotionally challenging, particularly when concerns about children, finances, and long-term stability are involved. While litigation is sometimes unavoidable, many divorcing couples benefit from resolving their disputes outside of court through mediation. In New Jersey, mediation offers an alternative approach that emphasizes collaboration, privacy, and efficiency.

Mediation allows spouses to work through divorce-related issues with the guidance of a neutral professional, often resulting in more tailored and less adversarial outcomes. It can be especially effective when both parties are willing to negotiate in good faith and maintain focus on practical resolutions.

Mediation Services Offered Through Skoloff & Wolfe

As part of our family law practice, we regularly represent clients in divorce mediation by helping them select an appropriate mediator and advising them throughout the process. In addition, Skoloff & Wolfe provides mediation services for divorcing couples represented by other law firms.

Hon. David J. Issenman, JSC (Ret.), who served for 20 years on the bench in the New Jersey Superior Court Family Division, offers mediation, arbitration, and discovery master services through the firm. Drawing on decades of judicial experience, Judge Issenman helps couples work toward informed compromises and durable resolutions. He also collaborates with our attorneys, providing insight and guidance that benefits our clients.

How Divorce Mediation Works

Mediation provides divorcing spouses with an opportunity to actively participate in shaping the terms of their settlement. Rather than having decisions imposed by a judge, parties work through issues with the mediator’s assistance, often with counsel present.

Through mediation, spouses may address matters such as:

  • Division of marital assets and debts
  • Spousal support and alimony
  • Child support
  • Child custody and parenting time

This process allows for creative problem-solving and agreements that reflect the specific needs of the family.

Benefits of Divorce Mediation

Mediation offers several advantages over traditional courtroom litigation.

Efficiency and Cost Savings

Divorce trials can be time-consuming and costly, requiring extensive preparation, expert testimony, and court appearances. Mediation typically reduces both the time and expense associated with resolving divorce matters.

Greater Control Over Outcomes

Mediation allows parties to retain control over key decisions rather than leaving outcomes solely to the court. Agreements reached through mediation can be more flexible and better suited to a family’s circumstances.

Reduced Stress and Conflict

By focusing on cooperation rather than confrontation, mediation often reduces emotional strain, particularly when children are involved.

Mediation in High Net Worth and Complex Cases

Mediation can be especially effective in high net worth divorces, where complex financial issues require careful discussion. Mediation allows time for meaningful dialogue regarding business valuation, investments, executive compensation, trusts, and other sophisticated assets.

Working with an experienced mediator, parties and their advisors can evaluate financial issues thoroughly and pursue equitable outcomes without the pressures of courtroom litigation.

Addressing Key Issues Through Mediation

Child Custody and Parenting Time
Mediation can help parents develop custody and parenting time arrangements that prioritize their children’s well-being while accommodating each parent’s circumstances.

Spousal Support
Rather than applying rigid formulas, mediation allows parties to craft spousal support arrangements that reflect income, lifestyle, and future planning considerations.

Division of Assets and Debts
Mediation provides a structured forum to address the division of property, retirement accounts, inheritances, debts, and other financial obligations in a thoughtful and customized manner.

Is Mediation the Right Approach for Your Divorce?

Mediation is not appropriate in every case, particularly where cooperation is not possible or urgent court intervention is required. However, when both parties are willing to engage constructively, mediation can offer a more efficient and less adversarial path forward.

If you are considering mediation as part of your divorce, experienced legal guidance can help you determine whether this approach aligns with your circumstances and objectives.

To discuss divorce mediation with a Skoloff & Wolfe family law attorney, call 973.992.0900.

acceptable grounds for divorce new jersey
Clashing Religious Beliefs, Custody, and the Constitution Jane J. Felton
Insights

Toward a More Perfect Dissolution: The History of American Divorce Law and Its Ghosts in Contemporary Practice

Jane J. Felton and Barbara A. Schweiger of Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C., trace the fascinating and often turbulent evolution of divorce law in the United States, with a special focus on the promises and pitfalls of no-fault divorce.

Their article offers a compelling perspective on how legal and societal attitudes toward marriage, gender, and personal autonomy continue to shape the realities of divorce today, and why meaningful reform remains both necessary and elusive.

Read the full article here (Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, Vol. 37, 2025).

Filing for Divorce in New Jersey: How to Prepare
Equitable Distribution of Privately Held Businesses in Divorce
Navigating the Complexities of Divorce Laws in New Jersey: What You Need to Know
Essential Divorce Preparation Tips: Guidance from New Jersey Divorce Attorneys
Understanding Alimony Laws in New Jersey: A Comprehensive Guide
how to find the best divorce attorney nj
retirement assets divorce new jersey
divorce family business
gavel on a judge's desk reviewing terms of a High-Asset Divorce
A good NJ divorce mediator speaking with a couple divorcing.
Publications

NJ Utility Can't Arbitrate Solar Row With Blackstone Unit

A New Jersey appeals court on Wednesday said a utility affiliate could not force arbitration of its dispute with a company backed by private equity firm Blackstone under a purported contract for the $17.1 million sale of solar renewable energy credits, finding the parties never entered into a binding agreement. The defendants are represented by Daniel M. Perry and Katrina Voorhees of Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP, and Jonathan W. Wolfe and Jane J. Felton of Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C.

Publications

Getting Started with the Divorce: What You Need to be Prepared

Publications

Only the Strong Survive: The Treatment of Survivorship Interests in Divorce

Publications

Deposition Practice: The New Jersey Experience

Publications

Unchartered Territory of Amending Prenuptial Agreements

Publications

Palimony Litigants Dispute Whether Writing Requirement Is Retroactive

Publications

Retained Earnings: Prudent Business Practice or Support Dodge?

Publications

Members on the Same Team—Forensic Accountants, Attorneys, and Clients

Publications

Avoiding Deposition Pitfalls

Publications

Prenuptial Agreements: Avoiding the Minefield

Publications

Building the Financial Aspects of a Divorce Case: Discovery and Analysis of Hidden Income and Assets

Publications

New Jersey Law Journal - Family Law: Show Me The Money

Publications

New Jersey Law Journal - Family Law: The New Secret Weapon: Retroactive Counsel Fees

Publications

New Jersey Law Journal - Contract Law: The Rules of Engagement